There are certain figures in Victorian London who crop up, on the boundaries of one's consciousness, with strange frequency. One such is the criminal beautician Madame Rachel, who I've already noted on the website, being chastised in 
Punch:-
To what kind of beings is it possible the subjoined advertisement, from the Morning Post, addressed?-
BEAUTIFUL WOMEN. - MADAME RACHEL begs to inform her lady patronesses,  the nobility, and aristocracy generally, that she has opened her ANNUAL  SUBSCRIPTION list for the supply of her Costly Arabian Preparations for the  restoration and preservation of female loveliness, which have obtained for her the  patronage of royalty - these being manufactured entirely by MADAME RACHEL, who has no  agents, and cannot be obtained from any other source. Terms as usual, 20 guineas  per annum, which includes every requisite for a most recherché toilet,  and two attendances by MADAME RACHEL, viz. one drawing-room and one state  ball.
To advertise cosmetics as being costly instead of cheap, if the advertisement were addressed to rational creatures, would be to  adopt a style of puff about as judicious as the cry of unsavoury fish. Soft  indeed must be that sex to which the costliness of any article could be a  recommendation of it. The softness which can accept Arabian Preparations, manufactured  entirely by MADAME RACHEL, as Arabian in any other sense than that in which they may possibly be associated with a Mosaic Arab seems quite waxy. The female loveliness which these preparations may be supposed calculated to  restore and preserve, appears indeed to be, as it were, that of the ladies in the hairdressers' windows, bright and brilliant with their glass eyes -  radiant in red and white wax. Imagination pictures MADAME RACHEL'S patronesses as  having been fashioned out of that plastic material, and animated with a faint  life by a disciple of FRANKENSTEIN. What real lady would be allured by such a  phrase as "a most recherché toilet?"
In another advertisement MADAME RACHEL describes herself as "the Enamellist." This notification is, like the foregoing, headed "Beautiful Women." Accordingly, we must suppose that beautiful women of a sort are the subjects of MADAME RACHEL'S enamelling processes; and  what sort of women can that be, but an artificial one? Pretty women, indeed,  they probably are. Fancy an enamelled object of affection! The nearest thing  to it well imaginable is, perhaps, a whited sepulchre.
She's a fascinating figure and it's marvellous to hear from one of this blog's erudite readers that she has written a book devoted to Madame Rachels' career. Here's author Helen Rappaport to tell you more:
There was a time, during the 1860s to 1880s when everyone in Britain -    and even beyond – knew the name Madame Rachel. But somehow, her story,    like many others in Victorian history, rapidly disappeared into the    footnotes of history and was forgotten, known only to a few avid    Victorianists who have picked up on her via an interest in the sensation    novel, in which she was satirized.
My new book    Beautiful For Ever: Madame Rachel of Bond Street, Cosmetician,    Con-artist and Blackmailer    (published by Long Barn Books) is very much in the Victorian true-crime    genre, featuring a reconstruction of Rachel’s notorious career – from    fish fryer in Clare Market, to dealer in hair restoratives at Bow    Street, to the legendary Madame Rachel of 47a New Bond Street – a woman    whose exotic premises welcomed fashionable ladies into Madame’s very own    ‘Temple of Renovation’, where she promised to transform her clients’    fading complexions and make them ‘Beautiful For Ever’.   
Within the walls of no. 47a Madame offered a range of absurdly    overpriced concoctions, all with suitably exotic names, the ingredients    of which she claimed to import from far flung Araby, Circassia and    Armenia. Such was the desperation of some of her vain and gullible high    society clients that she succeeded in fleecing them of all their money.    And when the money ran out, Madame Rachel took their jewels. For many    years she got away with it by preying on the terror of exposure all her    clients shared, at a time when the use of cosmetics was greatly frowned    upon and when most of them were in fact spending their husbands’ money    (before the days of the Married Women’s Property Act).
But in the end the law caught up with Rachel: in 1869 after a mistrial    and retrial the previous year and a long tortuous appeal she finally was    sent down for five years for fraud. Prison, however, did not deter her    and she was soon back at her old tricks on her release on a ticket of    leave in 1872. Another high profile trial in the Central Criminal Court    in 1878 brought a second 5-year sentence, which she did not survive.    Madame Rachel aka Sarah Rachel Levison or Leverson died in Woking    Invalid Convict Prison in 1880. But her name lived on in the many    enduring allusions to her in the Victorian press and literature. Mary    Elizabeth Braddon had begun the trend, alluding to her in    Lady Audley’s Secret   in 1862, followed by Wilkie Collins, who based the character of Maria    Oldershaw in    Armadale    on Madame Rachel that was published soon after; L. T. Meade did likewise    with    Sorceress of the Strand    in 1902. For many years after her death, Madame Rachel’s face powder was    widely on sale and he techniques for ‘enamelling ladies’ faces’ were    constantly referred to.
The cover of my book might look chintzy but it is deliberately    subversive: a very dark story lurks within. Rachel was one of the most    intimidating and intriguing Victorian women criminals I have ever    encountered and I was utterly gripped researching and writing her story.    There is very little reliable secondary source material on Madame    Rachel; this book has been written almost entirely from contemporary    accounts in the Victorian press, magazine and journals, and from    transcripts of the court cases. It was a joy to get back to the    real       story.
Learn more at http://www.helenrappaport.com/
 
No comments:
Post a Comment